Went along to a talk on the Beijing Olympic Stadium by Herzog + de Meuron last night. That's it in the image above (and in the links at the bottom of this post) Just look at the thing! Incredible stuff.
The talk was by ArupSport who're doing all the engineering and specialist sport architecture (i.e. the techie bits). Their focus was on how digital techniques and parametric modelling were allowing them to actually design this thing. There's honestly no way they could do it without the software they've got.
The whole thing as very impressive but I couldn't help feeling that this is a classic misuse of digital techniques. Don't get me wrong, the design is visually stunning and I'm sure the programme of the building will work well, but the financial and physical requirements of building this thing are phenominal. When you look at another digitally designed building, Fosters' Swiss Re Tower for instance, you can see that the use of digital design and construction methods has simplified both the design and construction processes. It has improved the project AND reduced cost. On the Beijing Stadium both design and construction have been made MORE complicated by the use of digital processes. Without parametric modelling, the architects would have to have rationalised their design and made intelligent choices of where to compromise in the battle between their vision and the realities of construction. If they did that (and I hope they still might, H + dM are GREAT architects) I reckon they could get a very similar design for less money and most likely with less construction headaches and time over-runs.
Anyway. It was a very interesting talk. That's just my rambling late night opinion, and what do I really know? I know the renders are VERY pretty. Check them out below.
/ Render #1 / Render #2 / Render #3 /
/ Render #4 / Render #5 / Render #6 /